The 119 Gallery annual retreat was held on Sunday, May 6th. During a discussion about the collection of facility usage or event fees, one of the participants, I think Andrea Pensado, asked how does this type of decision get made and enforced. In essence she was working for a traditional understanding of organizational priorities where the board defines some set of objectives and these are then executive by staff or on-the-ground workers. Yet within the context of the 119 this is not how decisions are enacted. Basically, decisions are more participatory or decentralized in nature where the individual involved in the transaction or exchange decides. Not that the person decides in a vacuum or in a context of no cultural or organizational values and goals, but basically individuals are agents in the process rather than avatars for the decisions of others. Within this context as well, those who decide also have responsibility to follow through with the decisions they enact. Board chair Jim Jeffers dubbed this style of decision-making — “The Bargainmaker is Always It” model. He was borrowing it from decision-making within his household context, but it was highly apt within the context of the 119.